Streetwise
Lauren Rudd
Sunday, July 28, 2013
25 Years of Streetwise
Benjamin Franklin was given to say that while you may delay,
time will not. And so it is that footprints in the sands of time once again mark
the anniversary of a journey begun long ago. On Sunday, July 31, 1988 the
following prologue appeared in the Trenton Times of Trenton, NJ.
“Today Lauren Rudd begins writing a weekly column about Wall
Street for The Trenton Times...”
Streetwise can now attest to its 25th anniversary as a
nationally distributed column without a single missed week. If you are keeping
count, those years represent 1,300 columns on the subject of Wall Street. The
irony of it all is what I wrote on that fateful day many years ago. Space does
not permit a full recital, but the following words that began the column back
then might once again be considered a prescient commentary on today’s market
activity.
“The individual investor has been pummeled and is ready to
surrender. What with the debacle of last October (Refers to the market crash of
October 19, 1987), many are deciding that they have had enough and are leaving
Wall Street, an action reminiscent of an audience walking out on a bad play.
After going down in flames that fateful day, individual
investors retreated to lick their wounds and to decide what to do next. This
leaves Wall Street worried and well it should. The individual investor has
always been its bread and butter. However, these same investors are now
beginning to feel that their trust in Wall Street may have been misplaced and
that the game is rigged with the spoils going to the large institutions.”
Yet, there has been a degree of change over the ensuing 25
years. The fair disclosure rule requires that everyone receive the same
information at the same time, while Sarbanes Oxley helps ensure that what you
read in a financial statement is more or less accurate. The Dodd-Frank Wall
Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and the Consumer Financial Protection
Bureau are additional small steps forward despite the continual efforts to
abandon and/or defund them.
No, the oversight is not perfect, as the victims of various
Ponzi schemes can readily attest to. Just as damaging is the continual violation
of the public trust, illustrated by the continual stream of insider trading
cases being brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Meanwhile, Main Street continues to writhe under the pain
inflicted not so long ago by the Great Recession. And Main Street is not some
ethereal concept but is comprised of those honest people who do honest work —
crack-the-bones work; lift-it, chop-it, empty-it; feel-the-flames-up-close work;
crawl-down-in-there work – work that someone must do.
Washington would be well served to learn from Main Street
about the need to do the things that no one wants to do but that someone must
do. Otherwise we will continually face potential economic destabilization as
less than one percent of the work force flaunts its ownership of a
disproportionate amount of our nation’s wealth; a point emphasized several years
ago by the equity analysts at Citigroup.
In an Equity Strategy Note dated March 5, 2006, they wrote
that the rich are the dominate drivers of demand, enjoying an increasing share
of the country’s income and wealth; wealth generated over the past 20 years as
corporate executives convert global resources into personal affluence at the
expense of labor.
David Gordon and Ian Drew-Becker of the National Bureau of
Economic Research once wrote that the top one percent of the population have
benefited disproportionately from the country’s productivity surge.
Yet, Citigroup also pointed out that a plutonomy, an economy significantly
influenced by the very wealthy, is not without risk. That political
enfranchisement remains one person, one vote (questionable nowadays) and
eventually Main Street will fight back as programs designed to aid the poor and
the aged, specifically Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security, become
sacrificial lambs to be slaughtered on the altar of deficit reduction, despite
the overwhelming evidence that Keynes was right; austerity is not the answer.