Streetwise
Lauren Rudd
Sunday, October 17,
2010
Fear and Greed Continue As Always
Recently there has been a resurgence of concern over whether
fear and greed are once again taking hold as the driving force behind the gains
on Wall Street. I hate to mention this, but when have they not been the driving
force?
You need to accept the fact that Wall Street is what it is;
keeping in mind that the desire for a quick profit can often result in
short-term behavior that is both unexpected and unpredictable. This was well
demonstrated during the May 6 “flash crash.”
Subsequent inquiries into the crash dwelled on the legitimacy
and future impact of the so-called high-frequency traders, those traders whose
ultra-fast computers and sophisticated computer software enables them to buy and
sell financial instruments in a fraction of a second, often ahead of pending
trades.
While initially blamed for the debacle, the high-frequency
traders were quick to complain that they were unduly impugned and expressed
relief when Waddell, a mutual fund company based in Kansas, was tagged as being
responsible for the trade that triggered the crisis.
However, the recently released report by regulators made it
clear that Waddell, which was not mentioned by name, did nothing illegal.
Rather, the report stated that there were identified flaws in a computerized
trading algorithm that resulted in a failure to sufficiently take into account
price and volume factors prior to executing an exceedingly high volume
transaction.
Translated, the tremendous size of a sell order in the
futures market caused a panic in the equity markets, setting off a chain
reaction that evaporated liquidity and forced equity prices to fall an
inordinate amount in a matter of minutes.
While May 6 was certainly an anomaly, the Street’s
professional traders are quick to take advantage of smaller abnormalities that
continually take place during a regular trading day, offering up a defense that
they provide needed liquidity to the markets. Yes, they do provide a degree of
liquidity.
However, as we also saw on May 6, when really needed many of
those so called liquidity providers were quick to disappear until the markets
began to recover, at which point they feasted on the resulting carrion.
Nonetheless, Wall Street still offers up the greatest potential for accumulating
wealth.
So where do you start? One suggestion might be to look at the
technology sector in general and Intel (INTC) in particular. I have not
discussed Intel for several years because the company has had a miserable
performance in terms of stock price appreciation, specifically a negative 24
percent return over the past three years. However, that appears to be changing
as Intel casts its net of innovation over an ever widening marketplace.
For its most recent quarter ended June 26, the company
reported record third-quarter revenues of $11.1 billion, an increase of 18
percent over the comparable period a year ago. Operating income came in at $4.1
billion, with net income of $3.0 billion and earnings of $0.52 per share.
The company’s gross margin was 66 percent of revenue and was
consistent with prior guidance of 65 to 67 percent. The effective tax rate was
30.5 percent, slightly below the company's expectation of approximately 32
percent. More important is Intel’s outlook for the future. According to its most
recent guidance, Intel is expecting fourth quarter revenue of $11.4 billion,
plus or minus $400 million, with a gross margin number of 67 percent, plus or
minus a couple percentage points.
The intrinsic value of the shares using a discounted earnings
methodology with an earnings growth rate of 12 percent and a discount rate of 10
percent is $25 per share. The more conservative free cash flow to the firm model
generates an intrinsic value of $47 per share.
My earnings estimate for the current fiscal year is $2.08 and $2.28 for 2011. I
have a 12-month price target for the share of $22, as compared to the recent
price of $19.24, for a gain of 15 percent. In addition, there is an indicated
dividend yield of 0.63 percent.