Streetwise for Feb 7,  2010

Streetwise for Sunday Feb 7, 2010

 

 

Streetwise

 

Lauren Rudd

 

Sunday, February 7, 2010

 

 

Dueling Groundhogs Get Political -  But Can They Forecast Wall Street

 

  

 

The rampant discourse over the Nation’s economic future took a back seat to some more important forecasts this past week as fractious factions faced off over the issue of who was the superior groundhog on Groundhog Day.

 

Selected members of Marmota monax found themselves yanked out of their comfortable dens at 7:34 a.m. to view their shadows, the purpose being to predict the weather six weeks into the future. Staten Island Chuck found himself up against the powerful PR machine of Punxsutawney Phil. Not to be outdone, General Beauregard Lee of Georgia, who holds honorary doctorates from the University of Georgia and Georgia State in "Weather Prognostication," took on Sir Walter Wally of North Carolina.

 

Given the expertise most groundhogs have with the English language, not to mention meteorology, there is probably some doubt as to scientific strength of this forecasting approach. Nonetheless, honors go to Staten Island Chuck for his comment on the nation’s political situation...he bit New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg on the finger.

 

Unfortunately, many on Wall Street are in the same league as your local groundhog. Consider, for example, those who believe the Super Bowl can forecast the stock market. Supposedly accurate 34 out of 43 times, the Super Bowl predictor states that at least two of three major market indices will rise when an original NFL team wins.

 

However, if a team from the old AFL wins, at least two indices from among the Dow Jones industrial average, the S&P 500 and the NYSE composite index are headed downward.

 

You can relax, your portfolio is safe. This year it will not matter which team wins because both have roots in the old NFL, therefore a market rally is in the offing. One well known Wall Street veteran was given to say, "The Super Bowl predictor is better than any package of Ph.D.s, gaggle of gurus or assemblages of analysts I've ever heard of.” Oh, how I yearn for the late Madam Marie and her crystal ball.

 

Yes, I am aware that there is a modicum of statistical data that correlates various aberrations in the financial markets with certain calendar or non-financial events. A good example is the so-called January effect, a calendar-related anomaly where stock prices supposedly increase during the month of January. Based on what happened this past January, maybe we should go back to using football games.

 

Yet, despite the adherence by some to a medley of unorthodox ideologies, the Street’s prognosticators are a rather tame bunch when compared with the lively group of elected officials tasked with bringing order to financial markets. Gail Collins of the New York Times affectionately referred to them as a pack of rabid otters.

 

She succinctly pointed out that the House hates the Senate. The liberal Democrats hate the moderate Democrats. The normal conservative Republicans hate the hyper Tea Party types. The Tea Party types are having so many internal fights that there’s a definite danger of broken crockery. And, of course, everybody hates the bankers, except the Republicans who sat on their hands when the president called for taxing the banks.

 

Meanwhile, Goldman Sachs, the firm that stated indignantly it did not need the $10 billion taxpayer bailout, or the $12.9 billion handout from AIG, or the taxpayer guarantees behind its borrowing, is now considering awarding CEO Lloyd Blankfein a $100 million bonus.

 

“This is Lloyd thumbing his nose at Obama,” a Goldman rival was overheard to say at the recent World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland.

 

At a minimum we need the Volcker Rule. Its implementation would prevent commercial banks from owning hedge and private equity funds, as well as bar them from speculative or proprietary trading.

 

Recoiling in horror, banks have countered that it's impossible to define proprietary trading. Nonsense, says Volcker, "Every banker knows very well what 'proprietary trading' means." Hmm...Maybe we let Congress look for its shadow, while groundhogs regulate Wall Street...and hopefully bite Blankfein on the finger.