Streetwise
Lauren Rudd
Sunday, March 15,
2009
Don't Fall Victim To The Dark Side
Your primary investment objective should always be to achieve
financial returns in excess of what you will lose through taxes and inflation.
However, do not ask for the impossible. To be desirous of “beating the market”
or to reach for unrealistic returns is to fall victim to greed, and greed, to
use an analogy from the Star Wars epics, is the dark side.
Now I know what you are asking yourself, given the current
recessionary outlook, the downturn in the stock market, the plummeting real
estate market, rising unemployment and the tab taxpayers are picking up after
the last party on Wall Street, I would have the temerity and audacity to suggest
continuing to invest in stocks?
Absolutely correct! In fact, I believe in equities now more
than ever. The shares of American industry have, with only a few exceptions,
been unfairly and undeservedly beaten down to levels that are unjustified. Yes,
Wall Street has an unenviable record that is overly abundant in greed and
stupidity. However, the Fed and the Treasury Department are taking the
appropriate corrective action. Note that I left Congress off the list.
Unfortunately, our elected congressional representatives are
so busy bickering, back-biting and playing one-upmanship that it is surprising
when anything of merit is accomplished. Asking them to take rational decisive
action on a subject as complex as financial regulation that is further
complicated by fervent attacks from lobbyists, whose clients revel in an
unregulated environment at taxpayer expense, is unrealistic.
Although there is some validity to the idea that a new broom
sweeps clean, not everyone should be painted with the same brush. For example,
Ken Lewis, head of Bank of America, may not be a candidate for angel wings or
sainthood but he is an astute executive and one who appears to place shareholder
interests above his own. Furthermore, based on publicly available material, it
is hard to fault his decisions considering the data he had at the time he made
them.
Would Lewis have made the same decisions today given how life
has unfolded? Let’s just say that John Thain, former Merrill Lynch CEO, is
probably no longer on Lewis’ Christmas card list. However, hindsight is always
20/20. Meanwhile, as the economy begins to expand in earnest, most likely in the
first quarter of 2010, Bank of America is well positioned to capitalize on that
growth.
Of more immediate importance is where the bank stands today.
First of all understand that we are a capitalistic society and we do not
nationalize industries. Furthermore, both the Fed and Treasury have made it
clear that “nationalizing” the banking industry is not going to happen.
So what is the value of Bank of America? Consider first that
it has shares of ownership in foreign banks valued at approximately $4.5
billion, in addition to its 16.7 percent share of China Construction Bank, worth
about $20 billion. It also owns $5.75 billion of BlackRock, a successful asset
manager. Added together the bank has external investments of $30.25 billion. Its
recent market capitalization, defined as share price multiplied by outstanding
shares, is $30.02 billion.
That means Wall Street is attributing a value of zero to the
bank’s retail business, commercial clients, credit card customers, mortgage
business, investment banking activities, asset management and brokerage
businesses. Anyone see a blue light?
Looking ahead, my estimate is that Bank of America will earn about 60 cents per
share in 2009 and triple that or about $1.80 in 2010. Awarding the bank a
conservative multiple or P/E ratio of 10 by the close of this year and 15 in
2010, my 12-month forecast for the shares is $6.00, for an annual gain of 23
percent, and $27 in 24 months. Furthermore, I believe that Lewis will reinstate
the bank’s dividend in 2010.