|
|
MarketView
Events defining the day's trading activity on Wall Street
Lauren Rudd
Wednesday, June 18, 2008
Summary The Dow Jones industrial average hit a three month
low on Wednesday after slipping below 12,000 for the first time since
mid-March, as worries about a weak economy compounded credit sector
concerns and drove shares of banks, autos and transportation companies
sharply lower. Only four of the Dow's 30 components finished higher,
with Boeing leading that list. Triggered by fears of a slowing economy and the
forecast of dismal profits as rising fuel costs sap demand, FedEx saw
its share price, closely watched by Wall Street as a proxy for business
activity, fall $1.73, or 2.05 percent, to close at $82.60.
A 2 percent rise in oil prices above $136 a barrel
compounded concerns about rising raw material costs. Crude oil for July
delivery settled up $2.67 at $136.68 per barrel. Shares of General Motors fell $0.93, or 5.88 percent,
to close at $14.89, ranking as the Dow's largest percentage loser. GM
touched $14.75, its lowest level since the recession of 1982. Ford ended
the day down $0.38, or 5.76 percent, to close at $6.22. Bank of America ended the day down $0.87, or 2.98
percent, to close at $28.37, while SunTrust, a regional bank sank $3.66,
or 9.01 percent, to close at
$36.95. A rare bright spot was provided
by Boeing, whose shares rose $, or 0.4 percent, closing at $74.65 after
the U.S. Government Accountability Office recommended the Air Force
reopen a competition to award a refueling tanker program, potentially
worth $35 billion. Last February, the Air Force awarded the contract to
rival Northrop Grumman and its European partner EADS.
Dog Days In The Auto World
The shares of General Motors and Ford, auto parts
suppliers and auto retailers were under pressure on Wednesday as Wall
Street reacted negatively to signs of a further slowdown in auto sales
for the month of June and uncertainty about when the battered industry
will hit bottom. The sector-wide decline was accompanied by cautious
notes from analysts on GM's liquidity and by a warning from CarMax of
the fallout from an unprecedented collapse in demand for larger trucks
and SUVs. Tom Folliard, CarMax president and chief executive, told
analysts during a conference call that demand had fallen steadily over
the past several months for pickup trucks and SUVs, a once-lucrative
segment dominated by the "This has been going on for really since the
beginning of the year and has really steepened in the last couple of
months. And as of right now, I couldn't tell you when it's going to
turn," Folliard said. Chrysler, while now a private company, was not spared
the pain. Chrysler Chief Executive Bob Nardelli told employees of the
privately held automaker that overall sales had fallen below forecasts
in early June. Nardelli's memo to Chrysler employees, first reported by
the Detroit Free Press, said outside data showed a deep slump in early
June sales for the industry. "This is the lowest sales level in 16 years and
indicates a significant and continued softening of the GM's shares hit their lowest level since the
recession of 1982, while Ford’s shares were down nearly 6 percent,
erasing gains for the week. CarMax shares fell nearly 11 percent as the
largest domestic. used-car dealer suspended its financial forecast and
said traffic at its stores had weakened since late May. Analysts at JP Morgan and Deutsche Bank warned that
GM could be forced to borrow heavily as industry-wide
"The bank debt market is expensive but open, and we
believe GM, most likely before year-end and perhaps as early as the
third quarter, may announce a secured bank deal," he said. Patel said he
expected GM could borrow up to $10 billion, secured by assets such as
its overseas operations, trademarks for brands and inventories. Deutsche Bank analyst Rod Lache expects GM would be
forced to come up with a more "aggressive" restructuring that would
allow the automaker to borrow funds to ride out a projected cash burn of
$19 billion through 2009. Lache also cut his industry-wide Lache said he now expects 2009 industry-wide sales of
about 15 million vehicles, and sales of 16 million vehicles in 2010.
More immediately, he said, there was evidence that June sales were
falling to "surprisingly low levels." A survey of dealers, he said, suggested the
seasonally adjusted, annualized rate of sales was running near 13
million vehicles in the first half of the month, down from 15.2 million
in the first quarter and near 14.4 million in April and May. Adding to the gloom, Auto suppliers' shares were also hit. American Axle &
Manufacturing, which supplies axles and related components for trucks
and SUVs, saw its share price fall almost 9 percent. Magna International
said it would lay off about 400 workers from a GM, a major customer for Magna and American Axle,
recently said it would shut four North American truck plants, reducing
its pickup truck and SUV capacity by more than 700,000 units.
Red Ink At FedEx
FedEx posted a quarterly loss on Wednesday due to
high fuel prices, a weak economy and a previously announced write-down.
To make matters worse, it also issued a weak forecast for fiscal 2009.
The news weighed heavily on the stock market because FedEx is considered
a strong gauge of business activity. The company blamed its weak fiscal
2009 forecast on the impact of high fuel prices on demand for its
services. FedEx reported a fiscal 2008 fourth-quarter loss of
$241 million, or 78 cents a share, compared with a profit of $610
million, or $1.96 a share, a year earlier. Excluding a one-time charge
of $891 million, FedEx reported earnings of $1.45 a share. The charge
was related to a name change for FedEx Kinko's. Earlier this month FedEx
said it was changing the name of FedEx Kinko's, which has struggled in
recent quarters as its core copy print business has underperformed, to
FedEx Office. FedEx bought Kinko's in 2004. "Record-high fuel prices and the weak Revenue in the fourth quarter rose 8 percent to $9.87
billion. FedEx said it expects fiscal first-quarter earnings of 80 cents
to $1.00 per share. The company said it expects full-year fiscal 2009
earnings of $4.75 to $5.25 per share.
Boeing Gets Another Chance Government auditors urged the Air Force Wednesday to
rerun its competition for a $35 billion refueling-aircraft order,
upholding a protest by losing bidder Boeing. The Government
Accountability Office found the Air Force made "a number of significant
errors that could have affected the outcome of what was a close
competition." The contract was awarded on February 29 to a team made up
of Northrop Grumman Corp and GAO, a nonpartisan arm of Congress that reviews
federal contract bidding disputes, faulted the Air Force for seven
specific reasons, including "misleading and unequal discussions with
Boeing." The GAO's ruling is a recommendation to the Air Force, which
has 60 days to respond. It was an uncommonly harsh rebuke to the
service, which lists the tanker as its top acquisition priority. Sue Payton, the Air Force's top weapons buyer, said
the service was reviewing the decision and would spell out its response
as soon as possible. "The Air Force will do everything we can to rapidly
move forward so The GAO criticism may give Boeing another chance at
what is likely to be one of the biggest contracts in Pentagon history,
potentially swelling to $100 billion with follow-on orders. The $35
billion deal was to build 179 midair refuelers over the next 15 years to
replace its current fleet of Boeing KC-135 tankers, which average 47
years old. The issue could become a hot potato for Sen. John
McCain, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee who helped shape
the competition. As a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee,
McCain led an effort to kill what turned out to have been a corrupt Air
Force plan to lease and then buy 100 modified Boeing 767s as tankers
without the benefit of competition. Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama of The ruling also may cause shockwaves in Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin,
a Michigan Democrat, jumped on the Air Force to stage a new competition
in light of the GAO's ruling. Mark McGraw, the head of Boeing's tanker program,
said, "We look forward to working with the Air Force on next steps in
this critical procurement for our war fighters." Randy Belote, a
Northrop spokesman, said, "We continue to believe that Northrop Grumman
offered the most modern and capable tanker." EADS Chief Executive Louis Gallois told Reuters in The GAO said its decision should not be read as
reflecting any view of the 767 offered by Boeing versus the Northrop
offer, a modified Airbus A330. The GAO faulted the Air Force for, among
other things, failing to assess the relative merits of the competing
offers in line with its stated criteria. The Air Force also failed to take into account that
Boeing offered to satisfy more technical "requirements" than Northrop
even though the bidding rules explicitly asked the rivals to meet as
many as possible, GAO said. Lawmakers from Political support for both Boeing, the Pentagon's No.
2 supplier after Lockheed Martin, and Northrop, No. 3, is entrenched.
Look for the possibility that the DOD buys both Airbus and Boeing
tankers.
|
|
|
MarketView for June 18
MarketView for Wednesday June 18