|
|
MarketView
Events defining the day's trading activity on Wall Street
Lauren Rudd
Friday, September 25, 2009
Summary
Wall Street made it three in a row on Friday, as its
major equity indexes fell for the third consecutive day. Much of the
day’s decline could be attributed to disappointing housing and durable
goods data, while Research In Motion's lackluster results dented
optimism about technology spending. Shares of RIM closed down 17.04
percent at $68.91 and were a top drag on the Nasdaq. The decline came a
day after RIM posted quarterly revenues below Street forecasts and
offered a disappointing outlook. However, besides worrying about the
recovery, the market also is nervous that authorities might curb
stimulus measures too soon. Economically sensitive stocks bore the brunt of the
selloff, including technology, big manufacturers, banks, home builders
and some consumer companies. A rise in shares of companies which fare
better in an uncertain economy, including Coca-Cola, helped indexes
finish the session off their worst levels. Even so, the S&P 500 snapped
a two-week winning streak and suffered its biggest weekly drop since
early July. Wal-Mart was off 2.4 percent to $49.47 and was the
worst drag on the Dow Jones industrial average, followed by United
Technologies, down 1.3 percent to close at $61.54. For the week, the Dow
fell 1.6 percent, the S&P 500 was down 2.2 percent and the Nasdaq fell 2
percent. KB Home closed down 8.5 percent to $16.96 after
reporting a wider-than-expected quarterly loss and its CEO indicated
that he does not expect meaningful improvement in the U.S. housing
market in the near future. American Express fell 2.3 percent to $33.07,
while JPMorgan closed down 1.6 percent to $43.65.
Economic News Mixed According to reports by the Commerce Department on
Friday, new durable goods orders fell in August, while new home sales
came in above expectations. Those reports overshadowed the increase in
consumer confidence this month to its highest point since January of
last year. Durable goods orders fell 2.4 percent in August,
the largest percentage drop since January, after rising 4.8 percent in
July, the Commerce Department said. The department also reported that
sales of newly built single-family homes rose 0.7 percent in August for
a fifth straight month to a 429,000 unit annual pace, the highest since
September last year. The drop in durable goods orders, a leading
indicator of manufacturing activity, was largely caused by a decline in
new orders for commercial aircraft -- likely reflecting a drop in orders
received by Boeing. Still, new durable goods orders excluding
transportation were flat in August after rising for three straight
months, the Commerce Department report showed. The market had expected a
1 percent gain after a 1.1 percent rise in July. Non-defense capital goods orders excluding
aircraft, a closely watched proxy for business spending, also fell
unexpectedly by 0.4 percent in August. At the same time, core capital
goods fell 1.3 percent in July. In Friday’s housing report, the Commerce Department
reported that total new homes sales fell 3.4 percent compared with
August last year. At the same time, the median home sales price in
August fell 11.7 percent from a year earlier to $195,200, the lowest
since October 2003. In July, the median home price was $215,600. The inventory of new homes available for sale at
the end of August fell 3.0 percent to 262,000 units, a near 17-year
trough. The August sales pace left the new inventory at 7.3 months, the
lowest since January 2007, the department said. The Reuters/University of Michigan Surveys of
Consumers' final index of sentiment for September rose to 73.5, the
highest reading since January 2008, from a reading of 65.7 in August.
Fed Unsure When And How To Keep Markets Informed Federal Reserve officials are concerned about when
to start and how quickly to act and furthermore how to inform the
markets as to the timing and pace of the central bank's removal of its
support for the economy stating that the change in policy could come
quickly and might be hard to communicate to financial markets. A shift in the Fed's policy could come before it is
clearly necessary based on economic data and could be swift, Fed
Governor Kevin Warsh said at a Chicago Fed/World Bank conference. "If policymakers insist on waiting until the level
of real activity has plainly and substantially returned to normal -- and
the economy has returned to self-sustaining trend growth -- they will
almost certainly have waited too long," he said. The Fed earlier this week announced it would begin
tapering off some of its exceptional support for the economy amid early
signs of growth after a painful recession while renewing a pledge to
hold benchmark interest rates exceptionally low for a long time. Warsh is apparently quite concerned that there is
concern among the Fed’s policy-makers that a too-slow removal of support
policies and raising of interest rates risks igniting inflation.
However, he played down any notion that his remarks are a sign a shift
in Fed policy would come soon. "I'm confident markets will not conflate those (frank
discussions of the policy outlook) with imminence," Warsh said while
answering questions after a speech in Chicago. The economy may be
looking up, but is still in a "long, long period of repair," he added. Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke said earlier in the day
to a congressional group that demand for the Fed's program backing
consumer and small business loans remains strong but that demand for
many of the Fed's facilities aimed at making short-term funds available
is fading. Warsh said velocity of the policy turn could also
be faster than many expect and echo the dramatic moves made by the U.S.
central bank during 2007 through 2009. "If 'Whatever it takes' was appropriate to arrest
the panic, the refrain might turn out to be equally necessary at a stage
during the recovery to ensure the Fed's institutional credibility," he
said. The hawkish remarks echoed those made by Warsh in an
op-ed piece in The Wall Street Journal published on Friday. That article, which suggested a more pro-active
policy shift, prompted dealers to push up the implied chances for Fed
rate hikes in the first half of 2010. Warsh said that data in the past couple of months
show continued improvement in the economy and that a virtuous circle
could be developing between more stable financial markets and real
economic activity. In contrast to the languid pace of policy change
suggested on Thursday by White House aide Christina Romer, who said that
talk of a fast exit strategy made her "cringe," Warsh suggested the Fed
act decisively. "Ultimately, when the decision is made to remove
policy accommodation further, prudent risk management may prescribe that
it be accomplished with greater swiftness than is modern central bank
custom," he said. St. Louis Fed Reserve President James Bullard said
on Friday it is difficult to communicate the Fed's likely monetary
policy direction clearly to markets with benchmark interest rates near
zero. He suggested in a presentation at a Swiss National
Bank conference in Zurich that policymakers settle on some type of rule
for explaining how the U.S. central bank's purchases of long-term
securities should be adjusted in response to changing economic
conditions. "Quantitative rules are generally not as
satisfactory as interest rate rules," Bullard said. "But it is still
worthwhile to use them because of the need to communicate future
monetary policy to markets."
|
|
|
MarketView for September 25
MarketView for Friday, September 25