|
|
MarketView
Events defining the day's trading activity on Wall Street
Lauren Rudd
Thursday, May 7, 2009
Summary
There was profit taking on Wall Street on Thursday as
analyst downgrades hurt telecoms and a tepid response to a government
bond auction raised fears about public finances. Bank stocks also
succumbed to profit-taking, a day after leaked results from so-called
stress tests suggested that most banks were healthier than previously
thought. Nonetheless, stock index futures rose after the
official government results were released as regulators told leading
banks to raise $74.6 billion to build a capital cushion officials hope
will restore faith in financial firms and set a course out of the
deepest recession in decades. Shares of several major banks, including Citigroup
were also higher after the bell, with Citi gaining 6.6 percent to $4.06
after regulators indicated that the bank's capital need was $5.5
billion. Citi had ended the regular session down 1.3 percent. Looking at some other banks stocks, shares of
JPMorgan Chase fell 5.3 percent to $35.24 in regular trading, and were
little changed after the stress test results. The government concluded
that the bank had no need to raise additional capital. Shares of Bank of America were up 6.8 percent after
the bell to $14.43 after regulators stated that the bank would need
$33.9 billion of fresh capital, in line with what had been leaked
earlier. The stock had ended regular trading up 6.5 percent. Wells Fargo slid 7.8 percent to $24.76 in regular
trading. After the bell the bank announced a $6 billion common stock
offering. At the same time, regulators told the bank to raise $13.7
billion of capital by November 9. During the regular trading session there was concern
that poor demand for government debt could raise the cost of capital and
hamper chances of an economic recovery. The $14 billion Treasury bond
auction met below-average demand from investors, who bid aggressively to
force the government to pay a higher yield as it pushed ahead with plans
to help finance its burgeoning budget deficit with additional longer
term debt. Treasury debt prices slid, sending the 30-year Treasury bond
yield to its highest since November. Shares of IBM were down 2 percent to $102.59, making
it the largest drag among the components of the Dow Jones industrial
average, while Apple, down 2.6 percent, pressured the Nasdaq. The semiconductor index .SOXX fell 6 percent, but is
still up 33.6 percent since the broader market's 12-year low of March 9.
Tech has provided a crucial underpinning of the market's run-up since
then, along with bank stocks. Other tech casualties included
Hewlett-Packard, off 5 percent at $34.53 and Qualcomm, down 3.2 percent
to $42.34. Shares of Cisco also were down, falling 3.4 percent to $18.95
despite some stronger-than-expected quarterly earnings late Wednesday. Shares of key manufacturers were hit hard, with
Caterpillar sliding 5.2 percent to $37.92. Crude At
6-month High Oil prices closed at a six-month high on Thursday
amid simmering hopes for an economic recovery that could lift ailing
world energy demand. Sweet domestic crude futures for May delivery
settled up 37 cents per barrel at $56.71, making it the highest
settlement since November 14, after hitting a peak of $58.57 earlier in
the session. London Brent crude settled up 32 cents per barrel at
$56.47. Oil prices are up in price by more than 10 percent in
two weeks, due in large part to mounting evidence that the global
economic crisis is easing, paving the way for a rebound in world oil
consumption. Encouraging this optimism was the Labor Department data on
Thursday indicating that the number of workers filing new claims for
jobless aid unexpectedly fell by 34,000 last week. Oil's gains were also pegged in part to government
data showing a smaller-than-expected increase in U.S. crude stockpiles.
Crude stocks are running at their highest since 1990 as a slowdown in
demand backs more barrels into storage. Saudi Arabia, the world's top oil supplier, said it
would not raise supplies for the time being as it attempts to shore up
prices. The kingdom is pumping below 8 million barrels per day (bpd) and
is unlikely to increase that production as world supply continues to
outpace demand, Saudi Aramco Chief Executive Khalid al-Falih said on
Wednesday. OPEC producers have agreed to cut some 4.2 million barrels
per day from the world market since September. Chairman
of New York Fed Resigns Stephen Friedman, chairman of the New York Federal
Reserve Bank's board of directors, resigned on Thursday amid questions
about his purchases of stock in his former firm, Goldman Sachs.
Friedman, a retired chairman of Goldman Sachs who has led the New York
Fed's board since January 2008, said he quit to prevent criticism about
his stock buying from becoming a distraction as the Fed battles a severe
U.S. recession. "Although I have been in compliance with the rules,
my public service motivated continuation on the Reserve Bank Board is
being mischaracterized as improper," he said in a letter of resignation
to New York Fed President William Dudley. "The Federal Reserve System has important work to do
and does not need this distraction," Friedman said. Friedman bought Goldman shares in December 2008 and
in January of this year, which became public with a Wall Street Journal
report on Monday. Friedman obtained a waiver of the bank stock ownership
rules, which the Journal said was granted just before he bought stock in
January, that allowed him to hold them until the end of this year. Last
week, he said he would resign by then. While the Fed was deciding whether or not to grant
Friedman a waiver, he bought 37,300 Goldman shares on December 17, for
an average price of $80.78, according to regulatory filings. Then on
January 22, he bought 15,300 more shares for average prices of $66.19
and $67.12, according to filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission. The January purchase brought his total holdings to 98,600
shares. Goldman shares closed on Thursday at $133.73, meaning
Friedman has profited handsomely, earning more than $3 million in total
on the two purchases. "Clearly he should not have done that (bought more
Goldman shares), and probably even before he did that, he should have
gotten off the board," said Alfred Broaddus, former president of the
Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond. John Dunbar, a senior fellow at the Center for Public
Integrity, a nonprofit watchdog group in Washington, said the stock
purchases were a "complete conflict of interest." "It is almost comical.
If you tried to do that in a more traditional Washington bureaucracy,
there is no way on earth you would get away with that," he said. Fed insiders were also troubled over the situation,
which they felt cast a question mark over ethical standards at the
central bank. "All the other banks are furious. No one else would have
let this happen," said one official at another regional Fed bank. "We've
always made people leave (to avoid a conflict)," said the official, who
requested anonymity given the delicacy of the situation. Of all the other regional Fed banks, only Minneapolis
said that one of its directors had to apply for a waiver for bank shares
he held last fall when a number of former non-bank financial firms
sought banking holding company status. Several regional Fed banks said that their internal
practices would have prevented the problem cropping up in the first
place. "It is our policy to ask them to divest or resign," said a
spokeswoman for the Kansas City Fed said. With Friedman's resignation, the New York Fed's board
now has three vacancies. Indra Nooyi, chairman and CEO of PepsiCo, is no
longer on the board and former Lehman Brothers chief executive Dick Fuld
left in September. Now Banks
Need To Do Their Part Regulators told the largest 19 banks on Thursday that
some of them had to raise a total of $74.6 billion to build a capital
cushion officials hope will restore faith in financial firms and set a
course out of the deepest recession in decades. Within minutes of release of the bank "stress test"
results, which showed smaller capital needs than once feared, several of
the 10 firms needing capital immediately issued statements detailing how
they planned to raise it. Bank of America which accounted for almost half of
the total capital shortfall with $33.9 billion to be raised, said it
planned to sell assets, issue $17 billion in common stock, and take
other steps to fill the hole. "We're going to be watching carefully to make sure
they give us credible plans for raising capital and becoming privately
owned again," Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said at a news
briefing, referring to the entire group and not just Bank of America. The examinations, which involved more than 150
regulatory officials poring over the books of the 19 largest firms,
effectively drew a line between healthy and weak, and quantified exactly
how much those institutions struggling under the weight of souring loans
must raise. Several of the banks found to be adequately
capitalized said they wanted to repay taxpayer money as soon as possible
to get out from under the government yoke. Meanwhile, the relatively
modest size of the hole discovered by regulators carrying out the tests,
which were based on an "adverse" economic scenario, led to both applause
from investors who believe the worst is over and skepticism among those
who think the examination wasn't rigorous enough. At least two banks viewed the government's
assumptions as surprisingly gloomy. Wells Fargo said it did not get
enough credit for its expected revenue over the coming quarters, calling
the Federal Reserve's estimates "excessively conservative," and
Citigroup Inc also said it expected to earn more revenue than the
government forecast. The reviews, led by the Federal Reserve, were
designed to gauge how the 19 banks would fare if the recession worsened. Bank of America was found to have the largest capital
need. However, it said it did not need any more government money. Some
or all of its $17 billion of new common stock may be issued in exchange
for privately held preferred shares, of which it has about $30 billion. Wells Fargo was found to need $13.7 billion, auto and
home loan finance company GMAC $11.5 billion, and Citigroup Inc $5.5
billion. Several of the banks found to be in need of bigger
buffers rushed to explain how they intend to raise the capital.
Citigroup said it was seeking to exchange $5.5 billion in additional
preferred securities for common stock to fill its shortfall. The banks that have been told to build their capital
cushion have until June 8 to develop a detailed plan and November 9 to
implement it. Regulators had to walk a fine line as they sought to
convince skeptical investors the reviews were sufficiently rigorous
without unduly straining banks that were already in a precarious
financial position. The total figure appeared to be small enough to
ensure that the White House would not have to approach Congress for more
rescue money on top of the $700 billion approved last year, a request
that would likely be turned down because of voter outrage over the
bailouts. The tests found that total credit losses for the 19
banks may reach $600 billion in 2009 and 2010. All told, if the economy
performs as badly as the worst case scenario used in the stress test,
the 19 banks' losses would amount to $950 billion from mid-2007 through
2010. Banks may cover any capital shortfalls through a
mixture of asset sales, share sales, and perhaps the conversion of
preferred shares into common stock. Regulators have put special emphasis
on holding common capital rather than preferred because stock investors
view common as the best form of capital. For many banks, converting government owned preferred
shares into common could turn the federal government into the company's
biggest shareholder.
|
|
|
MarketView for May 7
MarketView for Thursday, May 7