|
|
MarketView
Events defining the day's trading activity on Wall Street
Lauren Rudd
Wednesday, March 23, 2011
Summary
The major equity indexes moved a bit higher on
Wednesday as materials shares rose, but rising commodities prices due to
turmoil in the Middle East and North Africa are pulling stocks in the
opposite direction. Meanwhile, the market's favored indicator of
anxiety, the Chicago Board Options Exchange Volatility Index or VIX is
indicates that concerns over unsettled world conflicts and natural
disasters has been tempered for the moment. However, a lack of trading
suggests that the optimism is limited. About 7.01 billion shares traded on the three major
exchanges, a number that was well below the daily average of 8.07
billion seen in 2010. The market posted the worst trading volume of the
year on Tuesday. Brent crude settled at $115.55 per barrel while
domestic sweet crude rose 78 cents to settle at $105.75 per barrel,
making it the highest close since September 2008, as further unrest in
Yemen added to risks of oil supply disruptions in the region. While
higher oil prices would benefit energy companies, they would have a
dampening effect on economic growth over a longer time horizon. Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold rose 5 percent to
$54.88 after CEO Richard Adkerson, speaking at a Reuter’s
summit in New York, said the company has the balance sheet to handle a
large acquisition. Valero Energy rose 2.6 percent to $28.83. For the
year, Valero's stock is up nearly 25 percent.
New Home Sales Continue Downward Slide According to a report released by the Commerce
Department on Wednesday, sales of new homes hit a record low in February
and prices were the weakest in just over seven years, underscoring the
housing market's lingering malaise, which could slow the economic
recovery. The report indicated that sales of new single-family
homes fell 16.9 percent to a seasonally adjusted 250,000 unit annual
rate, the lowest since records began in 1963, after a 301,000-unit pace
in January. An oversupply of homes exacerbated by an increasing
flood of properties falling into foreclosure is frustrating recovery in
the housing market. The housing market has remained on the periphery of
the broader economy's expansion. However, residential construction has
declined to about 2.3 percent of gross domestic product from a peak of
about 6 percent in 2005. Despite the surprise drop in sales, it is unlikely
that there will be another downturn in the housing market, derailing the
economic recovery. New home sales last month plunged to all-time lows in
three of the four regions and surprised economists who had expected them
to edged up to a 290,000 unit rate. The weak data weighed on homebuilder shares such
Toll Brothers and D.R. Horton, but overall, stocks recouped losses to
end higher. Prices of U.S. government debt were little changed, while
the dollar gained against a basket of currencies. Many of the Street’s analysts are optimistic
believing that home sales will pick-up from their current depressed
levels in the spring. The median sales price for a new home plunged 13.9
percent last month to $202,100, the lowest since December 2003. Compared
with February last year, the median price fell 8.9 percent. Foreclosed properties typically sell well below
market value, giving builders stiff competition and forcing them to hold
back on new construction. Housing starts recorded their biggest decline
in 27 years in February. February's weak sales pace pushed the supply of
new homes on the market up to 8.9 months' worth, the highest since
August and up from a 7.4 month inventory level in January. There were 186,000 new homes available for sale last
month, the smallest supply of homes since 1967. Despite lean
inventories, new home sales will likely continue to bounce along the
bottom for a while until the glut of previously owned homes is whittled
down. New home sales account for less than 10 percent of overall sales. According to the National Association of Realtors,
new home prices have been running 45 percent higher than existing home
prices, a premium that is historically about 15 percent, indicating
previously owned homes are selling well below the cost of construction.
Separately, the Mortgage Bankers Association said applications for home
loans rebounded 2.7 percent last week.
Fed Says Smaller Banks Get a Break
New financial regulatory reforms should help reduce
the edge that large banks have over smaller ones because of their
implicit support from government, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke
said on Wednesday. Bernanke argued the Dodd-Frank reform legislation
will address the issue of firms perceived as too big to fail by
restricting their activities, raising their capital requirements and
enhancing regulators' ability to wind them down. "A financial system dominated by too-big-to-fail
firms cannot be a healthy financial system," Bernanke told a group of
community bankers in a speech that did not touch on the broader economic
outlook. "One benefit of the reforms should be the creation of a more
level playing field for financial institutions of all sizes," Bernanke
said. Some Fed officials, including Richard Fisher,
president of the Dallas Fed and Thomas Hoenig, president of the Kansas
City Fed, have argued the legislation does not go far enough. They have
called for very large banks to be broken up.
Bernanke said part of the reason the new laws
governing the financial sector would support community banks was that
regulators are cognizant of their concerns and challenges. With that in
mind, the Fed is aware that many community banks need time to recover
from the financial crisis. "We recognize the importance of striking the right
balance between promoting safety and soundness throughout the banking
system and keeping the compliance costs for smaller banking firms as
small as possible," he said. Bernanke went on to say that the recent banking
crisis suggested that fancy computer models are no substitute for
on-the-ground intelligence on lending, joking the IBM computer that had
recently won the U.S. game show "Jeopardy!" was not well equipped to
make credit decisions. "This advantage for community banks is fundamental
to their effectiveness and cannot be matched by models or algorithms,"
Bernanke said. "Watson may play a mean game of Jeopardy, but I would not
trust it to judge the creditworthiness of a fledgling local business or
to build longstanding personal relationships with customers and
borrowers."
No Dividend Increases for Bank of America The Federal Reserve told Bank of America to rein in
its plans for a modest dividend increase, a sign that regulators still
view the lender as being financially weaker than its rivals. Bank of
America had hoped to be in a second wave of banks raising dividends in
the second half of this year. Unlike some of its major competitors, Bank
of America is still struggling to be consistently profitable and, by
some measures, has less capital. For the last two quarters, the bank has suffered
from mortgage-related losses, and it could be on the hook to repurchase
billions in toxic mortgages from investors. The largest U.S. bank by assets did not disclose how
much of a dividend increase it was looking for, and did not give a
reason for the rejection. Bank of America said it intends to submit a
revised proposal to the Fed and still hopes to increase its dividend in
the second half of the year. The announcement comes two days after Citigroup
restored its dividend to 1 cent per sharean amount equal to Bank of
America's current payout, after suspending it in 2009. The Fed's move highlights the extent to which the
banks that required the least government aid are recovering quickly,
while those that required multiple bailouts, like Bank of America and
Citigroup, face a longer road. On Friday, the Fed approved dividend increases for a
group of banks after conducting a second round of stress tests on the 19
largest domestic banks.
|
|
|
MarketView for March 23
MarketView for Wednesday, March 23