|
|
MarketView
Events defining the day's trading activity on Wall Street
Lauren Rudd
Friday, March 26, 2010
Summary
The Dow Jones industrial average and S&P were
virtually unchanged on Friday, giving back earlier gains after the
sinking of a South Korean naval ship, while tech shares' weakness kept
the Nasdaq in slightly negative territory. News of the ship sinking hit
sentiment, although it was also an excuse to sell stocks in what is
being viewed by some as an overvalued market. Stock prices were higher during the first part of the
trading day after European Union leaders agreed on a standby aid package
for Greece, and after better-than-expected March consumer sentiment
data. Euro-zone leaders unveiled a deal late Thursday in which Athens
would receive coordinated bilateral loans from other euro-zone countries
and the International Monetary Fund if it faced severe difficulties. The
euro-zone agreement relieved uncertainty about the European Union
dealing with the problem, which has weighed on equities in recent weeks. The Commerce Department reported on Friday that GDP
expanded at an annual rate of 5.6 percent in the fourth quarter, instead
of 5.9 percent, as it previously estimated. At the same time, the Nasdaq
felt the influence of Oracle, whose share price declined from a
nine-year high a day closing down 1.3 percent to $25.69. Separately, the
Thomson Reuters/University of Michigan's Surveys of Consumers consumer
sentiment index came in at a final March reading of 73.6, above
expectations, but unchanged from February. Chevron, up 0.9 percent at $74.43, supported the Dow.
Apple rose 1.9 percent to $230.90 and limited the Nasdaq's loss after
Credit Suisse raised its price target on the stock by $25 to $300,
citing strength in the tech company's iPhone unit. Another upside influence was RadioShack, which gained
after a report that it was exploring alternatives including a share
buyback or a possible sale of the U.S. electronics retailer that could
net more than $3 billion. The shares were up 8.5 percent to close at
$23.65.
AT&T To Take $1 Billion Charge for Health Care AT&T stated on Friday that it planned to record a $1
billion non-cash charge for the current quarter related to the new care
legislation, as lawmakers called on the company and three other large
employers to testify about expected cost hikes. AT&T's charge appeared
to be the largest in a series of charges announced by companies this
week. AT&T, whose annual revenue is expected to be $124.1
billion this year, said the charge is the result of a provision in the
law related to the tax treatment of Medicare subsidies. As a result of
the legislation, the company, which ended 2009 with 282,000 employees,
said it will be evaluating prospective changes to the health care
benefits it offers to employees and retirees. Under the health care overhaul large ranks of
retirees can no longer deduct from their taxes the subsidies paid by the
federal government for retiree drug benefits. According to reports, Verizon told employees that tax
burdens under the new law would likely filter down to employees. Other
companies that announced health care reform related charges include
Deere, which sees a $150 million charge for its current quarter, and
Caterpillar, which warned of a $100 million charge. The congressional letters to the companies said the
House Energy and Commerce Committee has made it a top priority to ensure
the law is implemented effectively and does not have unintended
consequences. They also said the companies' reports of cost burdens
appear to conflict with independent analyses. The Congressional Budget Office has reported that
companies that insure more than 50 employees would see a decrease of up
to 3 percent in average premium costs per person by 2016, the letters
said.
Fed Is In Uncharted Territory
The Federal Reserve's unprecedented dose of stimulus
to the economy during the recent financial crisis complicates the task
of pulling back when the time is right, top central bank officials said
on Friday. Fed Board Governor Kevin Warsh argued that tame inflation
readings today should not make policy makers complacent about the risk
of future price increases. "Inflation expectations will be anchored until they
are not," Warsh said in a speech in New York. "Central bankers would be
prudent to keep a very open mind about shocks that could happen
domestically and overseas." Ben Bernanke, the Fed chairman, told Congress on
Thursday that the central bank is aware of such risks and has the tools
necessary to withdraw monetary stimulus in time. These include direct
open market operations to drain reserves, raising the interest the Fed
pays on excess bank reserves parked at the central bank, and outright
sales of some of the nearly $1.5 trillion in mortgage-related assets the
Fed committed to buying over the course of the crisis. A small group within the Fed, mostly presidents of
some regional Federal Reserve banks, has shown discomfort with this
unorthodox policy, arguing it borders on fiscal policy and could make
removing liquidity from the system difficult. Charles Plosser, president of the Philadelphia Fed,
said on Friday in an interview with The Wall Street Journal it might be
prudent for the Fed to sell some of its mortgage assets before raising
interest rates to make policy more effective. In the past, Plosser has gone as far as suggesting
the Fed should undertake a swap of mortgage assets with the Treasury
Department so that its portfolio can return to being primarily composed
of sovereign bonds rather than private debt. "Given the market functioning, I don't anticipate
that selling MBS at a reasonable pace is going to have a tremendous
impact on mortgage rates," Plosser said. But James Bullard, president of the St. Louis Fed who
has also advocated asset sales as a potential early step in the Fed's
exit, said recent weakness in housing data was giving him pause. Sales of newly built U.S. homes fell for a fourth
straight month in February to a record low annual rate of 308,000 units. "It's making me nervous," he told Reuters on the
sidelines of a conference sponsored by the Fed. "I will be interested in
seeing the (upcoming) data, and if that begins to not look good, then
I'll start to wonder." Bullard said he does not foresee any sharp rebound in
housing activity, adding that stabilization in prices and sales would be
enough of a signal that selling assets would not be too disruptive. He
said the economy is on track for a reasonable recovery. Bullard asked Columbia Professor Michael Woodford,
whether he believed the central bank would have to drain reserves even
as it raises interest rates in order for rates to respond. Woodford
argued that such operations were not strictly necessary. Those
advocating them are being "excessively cautious.” In separate remarks on Friday, Fed Board Governor
Daniel Tarullo focused on regulation, his principal purview at the
central bank. He argued that public disclosure of bank stress test
results last year helped rescue the global financial system, and
regulators should weigh some level of transparency in future tests. Congress is considering various versions of financial
regulatory reform, some of which might reduce the Federal Reserve's role
over policy. Many fault the Fed for loose oversight that allowed dubious
practices in both banking and housing to thrive, leading to the
financial crisis. However, Tarullo argued the Fed has reformed its
ways, fine-tuning the way it supervises banks to include possible risks
to the system as a whole, looking beyond the individual conditions of
specific institutions.
|
|
|
MarketView for March 26
MarketView for Friday, March 26