|
|
MarketView
Events defining the day's trading activity on Wall Street
Lauren Rudd
Friday, March 6, 2009
Summary After a sharp rally in the morning that
evaporated by midday, a little bit of increased bullishness managed to
send stock prices higher by the closing bell, with the Dow Jones
industrial average and the S&P 500 indexes rebounding to end the day in
positive territory. Contributing to the upward activity in stocks was a
surge in oil prices that sent energy stocks higher and offset a sell-off
in technology shares on bets that the slowing economy will sap consumer
spending on items such as computers and other hi-tech equipment. Exxon Mobil and Chevron topped the Dow as the price
of oil rose 4.4 percent, or $1.91 per barrel, to settle at $45.52 on
expectations that OPEC might again reduce output. Chevron rose 3.2
percent to $58.27 and Exxon gained 2.9 percent to $64.03. The Street was also pleased to learn from a report by
the Wall Street Journal that Lloyds Banking Group and the Unfortunately, a four percent slide in Apple helped
keep the Nasdaq under water, dragging it to a 6-year intraday low.
JPMorgan cut its price target and profit views on Apple, citing signs
that Mac and iPhone volumes have been below expectations. Apple's stock
fell 4 percent to $85.30. Shares of big-cap technology stocks followed
Apple's lead, with cell-phone chip and technology supplier Qualcomm down
2.9 percent at $33.63. Overall, it was the fourth week of declines for all
the indexes, while the S&P 500 posted its worst week since November. For
the week, the Dow lost 6.2 percent, the S&P 500 was down 7 percent, and
the Nasdaq fell 6.1 percent. In addition, the week marked another leg
down for the bear market with both the Dow and S&P off more than 24
percent since the start of the year. The markets have seen about $11
trillion in value evaporate since the key indexes reached an all-time
high during October 2007. Even with the late-day bounce, there was on-going
concern with regard to the banking sector. As a result, JPMorgan fell 4
percent at $15.93 and Goldman ended the day down 7.4 percent at $75.65.
Bleak economic news added to the negative tone after a government report
indicated that the unemployment rate rose last month to 8.1 percent, its
highest level since December 1983, as 651,000 jobs were cut. The gloomy jobs picture is disconcerting news for
both companies and consumers, whose spending drives corporate profits.
Automaker and Dow component General Motors fell 22 percent to $1.45 a
day after auditors raised doubts about the company's viability. GM
traded as low as $1.27. Dow Chemical rose nearly 10 percent to $7.11 and Rohm
and Haas was up 18.1 percent to $63.80 after the companies confirmed
that discussions are under way with regard to their troubled merger. Dow
Chemical agreed last July to buy Rohm for $78 a share, but then pulled
out of the deal. In other M&A activity, Roche Holding AG raised its
offer to buy out the minority shareholders of Genentech to $93 per share
from $86.50, driving Genentech’s shares up 11.3 percent to $90.86. Unemployment
Hits 25-Year High The Labor Department reported on Friday that
unemployment rose to a 25-year high of 8.1 percent for the month of
February as employers, cut 651,000 jobs. In addition, 161,000 more jobs
were lost in January and December than previously reported, the Labor
Department reported in its monthly nonfarm payrolls report. Since the recession started in December 2007, the
economy has lost 4.4 million jobs, with more than half of that number
lost in the last four months alone. A total of 12.5 million people were
unemployed in February, the Labor Department said. However, the drop was not as deep as had been
expected on the Street, thereby taking some pressure off the Treasurys
market, with debt prices dropping. Nonetheless, February's jobless rate
was still the highest since December 1983 and was a half percentage
point above January's 7.6 percent. The increase was also the largest for any month since
April 1980. January's job cuts were revised to show a steep decline of
655,000, while December's payroll losses were adjusted to 681,000, the
deepest since October 1949. The Obama administration said February's jobs
statistics were more evidence of the depth of the recession. Speaking in The success of spending plan depends on stabilizing
the fractured financial system and the collapsed housing market, which
are at the center of the economic rout. Losses in February were broad
based, with only government, education and health services hiring.
Economists expected the pace of job losses to continue into 2010, even
with the much anticipated economic recovery is the second half of this
year. The manufacturing sector shed 168,000 jobs, after
257,000 vanished in January, while the construction sector lost 104,000
jobs, after losing 118,000 in January. The service sector, grouping
industries such as airlines, hotels, banks and restaurants, slashed
375,000 positions after shedding 276,000 in January. Companies struggling with falling revenues and tight
profit margins are axing jobs in huge numbers, forcing households to
further scale back spending, creating a vicious cycle. To make matters worse, a measure of the unemployed,
people working part-time for economic reasons and those who have given
up looking for work hit14.8 percent, the highest on records dating back
to 1994, from 13.9 percent in January. The Labor Department also noted a
sharp rise in the number of people experiencing long spells of
unemployment, with 2.9 million people having been unemployed for 27
weeks or longer in February, compared to 1.3 million in January. The length of the workweek was steady at 33.3 hours,
matching a record low registered in December. The factory workweek edged
lower to 39.6 hours from 39.8 in January. Weekly overtime hours at
factories slipped to 2.6 hours in February from 2.8 in January. Average
hourly earnings inched up to $18.47 from $18.44. Major Write
Downs Unlikely At GE Analysts at Merrill Lynch and Bernstein Research said
they did not see GE sharply marking down assets in its hefty finance arm
in the near future. "With financial companies around (the) world under
increasing pressure and governments injecting funds into multiple
financial institutions, we think investors have rightly questioned
managements' forecast and planning assumptions that continue to seem too
optimistic and out-of-step with the environment," Merrill Lynch analyst
John Inch, wrote to clients. Bernstein Research analyst Steven Winoker wrote that,
while he thinks GE will need to mark down the value of its financial
portfolio over time, he does not see an immediate and large write down
as likely. "Probably the biggest controversy surrounding GE
right now is what the fair value of (GE Capital's) $661 billion is
if/when a write-down to fair value should occur," Winoker wrote in a
note to clients. He estimated that parts of GE could be overestimating
the value of some of its assets -- for example, he calculates that its
real estate equity is worth about $20 billion, rather than the $32.7
billion GE estimated it at the end of the year. However, he saw no need
for immediate action. "We think such write-downs, if needed, would be
spread over several years, which will lessen the need for equity raises,
but will hurt long-term earnings," Winoker wrote. Inch, of Merrill Lynch, wrote that he considered it
unlikely GE would have to raise additional capital -- a step the company
has repeatedly said it regards as unlikely. But he warned that if that
changes, GE may it find it difficult to raise substantial money in
equity markets due to its low stock price. He noted that if GE Capital did face a funding
crisis, he believed it would be likely the "Investors cannot assume that the risks of a future
government bailout of GE Capital are zero," Inch wrote. Merrill Lynch cut its 2009 profit target for GE to
$1.16 per share, below his prior view of $1.32, which would represent a
roughly 38 percent drop on a per-share basis, excluding unusual items.
It cited the deteriorating economy. GE, which also runs the NBC Universal media business,
has not provided a numeric per-share profit target for the year, instead
setting out a framework that allows for a drop in profit at GE Capital
but modest growth at its big infrastructure businesses. Another question facing GE is what will happen to its
current top-notch credit rating. Many on Wall Street expect Moody's
Investors Service and Standard & Poor's to cut GE's "triple-A." GE's
chief financial officer and noted bond investor Dan Fuss of Loomis
Sayles said on Thursday they believed any cut to GE's rating would keep
the company in the "double-A" range. If its rating was lowered further, to "A+," Winoker
estimated GE would be on the hook for an $8.2 billion collateral call. A
far deeper cut, to "BBB+" would mean another $2.9 billion payment. The cost of insuring GE Capital's debt through
credit-default swaps declined on Friday, according to Phoenix Partners
Group. Investors were paying 15.5 percent upfront, meaning that it
required an immediate $1.55 million payment plus an additional $500,000
per year to ensure $10 million of GE debt for five years. At Thursday's
close they had stood at 16.5 percent upfront.
|
|
|
MarketView for March 6
MarketView for Friday, March 6