|
|
MarketView
Events defining the day's trading activity on Wall Street
Lauren Rudd Monday, August 4, 2008
Summary
Stock prices were lower on Monday sending all three
major equity indexes into negative territory for the day as shares of
energy and commodity-related companies fell as a result of declining oil
and metals prices. To make matters worse, the Street remained concerned
that the housing slump would continue to punish the financials. In
addition, the price of crude was lower again on Monday. Copper futures hit a six-month low as all the
industrial metals declined after rising inventories on the London Metal
Exchange reinforced concerns that economic slowdown could dent demand.
Gold dropped more than 1 percent. Domestic sweet crude settled down
$3.69 per barrel, or 2.95 percent, at $121.41. While the drop in crude prices was welcome news to
consumers as they filled up at the pump, there was concern on the Street
that a slowdown in global economic activity would lower demand. As a
result, Exxon Mobil saw the price of its shares drop sharply. Exxon
ended the day down $3.12, or 3.91 percent, to close at $76.60 and
Chevron fell $1.51, or 1.79 percent, to close at $82.80. Downward pressure on stocks occurred early in the
trading day after HSBC, Europe's largest bank, reported a 28 percent
drop in first-half profit as it took a $14 billion hit from bad debts on Meanwhile, economic data pointing to mounting
inflation pressures added to the market's concerns, as did news that WCI
Communities, a major New York University economics professor Nouriel
Roubini also fueled concerns about the slumping U.S. housing sector when
he told Barron's that the United States is in the early stages of a
recession that will last for at least 18 months and will help cause
hundreds of banks to fail. Government data that showed Qualcomm was among the largest decliners among the
NASDAQ 100, falling 4.7 percent to $52.87 after Motorola announced that
it had hired Qualcomm's chief operating officer to head its money-losing
mobile devices unit.
Crude Drops Sharply
The price of crude oil fell to a three-month low on
Monday, after Tropical Storm Edouard seemed less likely to disrupt oil
and natural gas output in the Also weighing on oil prices Monday was a report by
the Commerce Department that consumer spending after adjusting for
inflation fell in June as shoppers dealt with higher prices for
gasoline, food and other items. That added to expectations that the
economic slowdown is sharply curbing domestic demand for fossil fuels. Light, sweet crude for September delivery settled
down $3.69 per barrel, or 2.9 percent, at $121.41 per barrel. It was
crude's lowest settlement price since May 5. Crude has now fallen in six
of the last nine sessions and is down 18 percent off its trading record
of $147.27 reached July 11. Natural gas futures also fell sharply, dropping 66.3
cents, or 7.1 percent, to settle at $8.726 per 1,000 cubic feet. And
gasoline futures fell 8.41 cents, or 2.7 percent, to settle at $3.0002 a
gallon. Other commodities including gold, copper, corn and soybeans also
traded lower. Meanwhile, retail gas prices kept falling, reflecting
the continuing price-driven drop in the demand for gasoline. Gasoline
has fallen 5.6 percent since hitting an-all time high above $4 a gallon
on July 17, but so far hasn't kept up with oil's steep descent,
suggesting struggling filling stations are still saddled with gas bought
when crude prices were higher. Oil prices began the day trading mostly lower after
the Commerce Department said inflation-adjusted consumer spending fell
by 0.2 percent in June. That was the worst showing since February and
gave energy market traders another reason to sell on beliefs that people
will further cut back on their driving to cope with near $4-a-gallon
gasoline. The question is how the markets will react to On Sunday, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said
diplomacy was the only way out of the standoff. Those comments came a
day after he asserted his oil-producing country would not give up its
"nuclear rights," signaling that it would refuse demands to stop
enriching uranium or at least not to expand its enrichment work. In other NYMEX trading, heating oil futures fell 8.67
cents to settle at $3.3501 a gallon. In
Inflation Eats Stimulus Payments
In June, the second largest increase in inflation in
nearly three decades muted the impact of billions of dollars in
government stimulus payments, the Commerce Department said on Monday.
According to the Department, incomes barely rose in June and consumer
spending retreated after taking into account the higher prices for food,
energy and other items. Consumer spending was up 0.8 percent in May and 0.6
percent in June, the Commerce Department said. Those increases were
slashed to a modest 0.3 percent increase in May and a drop of 0.2
percent in June, however, when adjusted for rising prices of gasoline,
food and other products. Incomes rose just 0.1 percent. An inflation gauge tied to consumer spending
increased 0.8 percent in June. That was the second largest monthly
increase since 1981. In September 2005, the gauge rose by 1 percent
after Hurricane Katrina shut down The increase in energy and food prices had dampened
the impact of the government's economic stimulus program which was
pumping out $76 billion in payments during May and June as Even with the recent declines, gasoline is selling
for around $3.88 a gallon, up more than $1 from the price a year ago.
Last month, gas prices hit an all-time high of $4.11, according to AAA,
the Oil Price Information service and Wright Express. Given that
economists estimate that every $1 increase in gasoline is like a $120
billion tax, it's understandable that consumers are feeling stretched. The meager 0.1 percent rise in incomes in June
followed a sizable 1.8 percent jump in May. Those results were skewed by
how the government accounted for the billions of dollars in rebate
checks disbursed during the two months, inflating the May figure and
making the June performance look weaker. The overall economy, as measured by the gross
domestic product, grew at a 1.9 percent rate in the April-June quarter,
more than double the 0.9 percent increase in the January-March quarter.
That improvement reflected in part the stimulus payments, although the
effect was softened by a surge in energy costs. It is likely that the $168 billion stimulus program
will continue to lift the economy in the current quarter. However, the
economy could slow significantly in the final three months of this year
and early next year as the impact from the one-time checks wears off. The savings rate, as a percent of after-tax incomes,
dropped to 2.5 percent in June after having shot up to 4.9 percent in
May. Both months had a savings rate above the 0.3 percent level of March
before the stimulus payments began. The most extensive study done so far of the stimulus
payments showed that the average family spent about 20 percent of its
rebate in the first month after receipt. That's similar to the spending
rate in 2001 when the government was also trying to bolster the economy
with a stimulus package. Studies have shown about two-thirds of the 2001
payments were spent within the first six months. Jonathan Parker, an economist at Northwestern
University's Kellogg School
of Management and one of the authors of the 2008 study, said in an
interview that the typical family increased its spending on food, drug
products and other daily merchandise by 3.5 percent when the rebates
arrived relative to a family in similar circumstances who had not yet
received its rebate. The Treasury Department completed the mass
distribution of payments in the week ending July 11, sending out 112
million payments totaling $91.8 billion. Payments will continue in
smaller batches to households who file returns in coming months. In other economic news, the Commerce Department
reported that orders to U.S. factories shot up by 1.7 percent in June,
the fastest pace in six months, reflecting big increases in petroleum
prices and heavy demand for military equipment.
Head of new FHFA Considers Revising Capital
Requirements The head of the new regulatory agency overseeing
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is considering new capital requirements for
the mortgage finance companies, and said he expects the agency to move
with "deliberate speed." James Lockhart, chief of the newly-formed Federal
Housing Finance Agency and who also headed the predecessor regulator is
concerned that protecting the country's housing finance infrastructure
is his biggest priority. The Federal Housing Finance Agency was conceived as
part of a sweeping, housing-rescue bill meant to aid the battered homes
market and buttress Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac which had been pushed to
the brink of collapse. The FHFA, which replaces the Office of Federal
Housing Enterprise Oversight, will oversee Fannie and Freddie, the two
largest Mandating the capital cushions that Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac must hold against possible losses is one of the most
nettlesome duties facing the new regulator. The predecessor Office of
Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight needed nearly nine years to set
those standards. Since Lockhart became the overseer for Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac in mid-2006, he had argued for consolidation of all the
federal housing regulators. When President George W. Bush signed the
housing legislation on Wednesday, Lockhart became the new agency chief.
He is likely to be replaced soon after a new president is elected in
January but will help build many new systems before then. Lockhart said that he has spent the last two years
mulling how to set risk-based capital rules for Fannie Mae and Freddie
Mac but that establishing such standards would come only after much
input from mortgage industry stakeholders. A year ago, shares of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were
trading above $60 but were driven to single-digits early last month as
Wall Street remains concerned over future mortgage losses.
|
|
|
MarketView for August 4
MarketView for Monday August 4